"Diplomatic International Law and the Challenges of Digital Immunity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence."

Section: Article
Issue
Vol. 5 No. 19.3 (2025): مؤتمر العلوم الاسلامية
Pages
195-228

Keywords:

diplomatic international law, digital immunity, data protection, digital privacy, international relations, artificial intelligence

Abstract

Diplomatic international law is one of the most prominent regulatory tools that regulate relations between states and is facing increasing challenges due to rapid technological developments, especially in the field of digital immunity. This research aims to study the impact of technological developments on digital immunity and how states deal with the challenges to this protection under modern international laws. The research discusses how new technologies such as artificial intelligence and big data may pose new challenges to the ability of states to protect privacy. Finally, the paper offers potential solutions to develop a unified international legal framework that is flexible and responsive to ongoing technological developments

References

  1. Alaa, Hossam Eldin Atef Mohamed. (2021). Religious Diplomacy and Peacebuilding: Islamic Jurisprudential Comparison in the Light of Sunni Methodology. Tanta: Journal of Fundamentals of Religion and Islamic Propagation.
  2. ❖
  3. Ali Hussein Al-Shami. (2021). Diplomacy: Its Origin, Development, and Rules. All Books Library.
  4. ❖
  5. Ali Faraj Al-Ghamdi. (2021). International Immunities for Diplomatic Envoys in Islamic Sharia and International Agreements. Journal of Economic, Administrative, and Legal Sciences.
  6. ❖
  7. Qafaf, Taha, & Safia Yousfi. (2018). Diplomatic Immunity in International Law. Algeria: University of Biskra.
  8. ❖
  9. Muhammad. (2024). Diplomatic Immunity and Its Types and the Difference Between Embassies and Consulates.
  10. ❖
  11. Mahmoud Khalil Jaafar, & Mahmoud Sami Hassan. (2023). Reconciling Immunity Granted to Diplomatic Bags with National Security Considerations. Journal of Legal Studies.
  12. ❖
  13. Muslim Taher Hassan Al-Husseini. (2019). Protection of Diplomatic Mission Headquarters. Arab Center for Scientific Studies and Research.
  14. ❖
  15. Mousa Waali Bakir, & Thani Bin Ali Bin Sahela. (2022). Basis of Diplomatic Immunity in International Law Compared to Islamic Jurisprudence. Journal of Islamic Studies.
  16. ❖
  17. Maysa Awad Abu Hassanein. (2012). Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities: A Comparative Jurisprudential Study. Master’s Thesis, under the supervision of Professor Dr. Maher Hamid Al-Houli. Gaza: Islamic University.
  18. ❖
  19. Nanjira Sambuli. (2021). Global Governance of Digital Technologies: A Contemporary Diplomatic Challenge. Master’s Thesis. Faculty of Arts / Tanta University.
  20. ❖
  21. Nawal Meghzili, & Soumia Ouchen. (2021). Diplomacy in the Dominance of Digital Governance: Between Traditional Practices and the Necessity of Digital Transition. Journal of Social and Human Studies.
  22. ❖
  23. Nuri Rashid Nouri. (2016). International Law for Development. Journal of the Islamic University College.
  24. ❖
  25. Hicham Kwashi, & Bou Abdullah Larabi. (2017). Diplomatic Immunity.
  26. ❖
  27. Henry Kissinger. (2021). Diplomacy. Arab Books Magazine.
  28. ❖
  29. Haitham Naji Mohammed Al-Shujairi. (2024). Judicial and Criminal Immunity of Diplomatic Envoys. Anbar University Journal of Legal and Political Sciences

Author

Sufyan Saad Ibrahim

University of Mosul / College of Islamic Sciences / Mosul - Iraq

Identifiers

DOI: 10.33899/cjfwxx39

Statistics

How to Cite

"Diplomatic International Law and the Challenges of Digital Immunity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.". (2025). Journal of Education for the Humanities , 5(19.3), 195-228. https://doi.org/10.33899/cjfwxx39
Copyright and Licensing
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

"Diplomatic International Law and the Challenges of Digital Immunity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.". (2025). Journal of Education for the Humanities , 5(19.3), 195-228. https://doi.org/10.33899/cjfwxx39