Interpretation from the Fundamentals of Jurisprudence to Modern Linguistic and Philosophical Studies

This research attempts to shed light on the concept of interpretation in the principles of jurisprudence and then explain it in the modern linguistic and philosophical study and the extent of similarity of interpretation in the principles of jurisprudence with modern linguistic and philosophical studies and the extent of difference. The study here does not attempt to explain the priority of the party that dealt with interpretation as much as it attempts to reach a deep understanding of interpretation and the mechanisms of its application to texts and the turns that interpretation passed through to reach the image that we see in our present age. Perhaps the principles of religion are among the fields that have relied most heavily on interpretation in analyzing and understanding religious texts. Therefore, we have chosen it as a starting point and basis for arriving at modern linguistic and philosophical studies and clarifying the similarities and differences between the two fields and the extent to which one benefits from the other. Although the study is theoretical, we have attempted to include a set of practical examples. Thus, the study relied on both descriptive and analytical approaches, and we approached the subject from several perspectives: interpretation from language to terminology, interpretation in the Arab heritage, interpretation in modern linguistic and philosophical studies, and text and discourse: the horizon of intersection and compatibility between the principles of jurisprudence and modern linguistic studies