Discourse Accommodation and the Possibility of Fallacy: An Analytical Study of Escape Discourse in Arabic Heritage
Discourse Accommodation and the Possibility of Fallacy: An Analytical Study of Escape Discourse in Arabic Heritage
Abstract
This research examines the impact of logical fallacies on discourse accommodation in Arabic heritage contexts through Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT). The study analyzes how speakers strategically employ fallacies to accommodate their discourse for achieving objectives such as influencing audiences, reducing tension, and managing power relations. Using selected examples from Arabic heritage texts involving escape discourse and survival situations, the research applies an analytical methodology focusing on verbal, emotional, and social dimensions of accommodation strategies.
The findings reveal that speakers in critical situations successfully utilized fallacies as strategic tools for discourse accommodation. The analysis demonstrates how fallacies enhanced survival prospects, facilitated relationship management with dominant parties, and mitigated crisis intensity. The study shows the flexibility of Arabic discourse in employing convergence and divergence strategies, revealing speakers' expertise in managing communicative challenges. This research contributes to understanding Arabic heritage discourse and accommodation methods, offering a new framework for analyzing the relationship between traditional Arabic communication and contemporary linguistic theories
References
- Al-Andalusi, A. U. S. A. ibn M. ibn A. R. (328 AH/940 CE). Al-ʿIqd al-Farīd [The Unique Necklace]. Dar al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, Beirut (1st ed., 1404 AH).
- Al-Baghdadi, A. U. al-Q. ibn S. ibn A. al-H. (224 AH/838 CE). Al-Amthāl [Proverbs]. (A. M. Qatamish, Ed.). Dar al-Maʾmun li-l-Turath (1st ed., 1400 AH/1980 CE).
- Al-Tanukhi, al-M. ibn A. ibn M. ibn A. al-F. D. al-B. (384 AH/994 CE). Al-Faraj baʿda al-Shiddah [Relief After Hardship]. (A. al-Shalji, Ed.). Dar Sadir, Beirut (1398 AH/1978 CE).
- Ibn al-Jawzi, J. al-D. A. al-F. A. al-R. ibn A. ibn M. (597 AH/1200 CE). Kitāb al-Adhkiyāʾ [The Book of the Intelligent]. Maktabat al-Ghazali.
- Beebe, L. M., & Giles, H. (1984). Speech-accommodation theories: A discussion in terms of second-language acquisition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 5-32.
- Bell, A. (2001). Audience Design. In P. Eckert & J. R. Rickford (Eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation (pp. 139-173). Cambridge University Press.
- Bernhold, Q. S., & Giles, H. (2022). Emotional mimicry: a communication accommodation approach. Cognition and Emotion, 36(5), 799-804.
- Campbell, S. (1974). Flaws and Fallacies in Statistical Thinking. Prentice-Hall.
- Copi, I. M., Cohen, C., & McMahon, K. (2014). Introduction to Logic (14th ed.). Pearson.
- Damer, T. E. (2009). Attacking Faulty Reasoning: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments (6th ed.). Wadsworth.
- Farzadnia, S., & Giles, H. (2015). Patient-Provider Health Interactions: A Communication Accommodation Theory Perspective. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 3(2), 17-34.
- Gasiorek, J., Giles, H., & Soliz, J. (2015). Accommodating new vistas. Language & Communication, 41, 1-5.
- Giles, H. (1973). Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics, 15(2), 87-105.
- Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N. (1991). Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press.
- Giles, H., & Ogay, T. (2007). Communication Accommodation Theory. In B. B. Whaley & W. Samter (Eds.), Explaining Communication: Contemporary Theories and Exemplars (pp. 293-310). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Giles, H., & Williams, A. (1992). Accommodating hypercorrection: A communication model. Language & Communication, 12(3/4), 343-356.
- Gumperz, J. J. (1964). Linguistic and social interaction in two communities. American Anthropologist, 66(6), 137-153.
- Hamblin, C. L. (1970). Fallacies. Methuen & Co Ltd.
- Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 831-843.
- Salmon, W. C. (1973). Logic (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall.
- Salmon, W. C. (1974). The Logic of Scientific Inquiry. In R. Swinburne (Ed.), The Justification of Induction (pp. 85-97). Oxford University Press.
- Soliz, J., & Giles, H. (2014). Relational and Identity Processes in Communication: A Contextual and Meta-Analytical Review of Communication Accommodation Theory. Annals of the International Communication Association, 38(1), 107-144.
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7-24). Nelson-Hall.
- Trudgill, P. (1986). Dialects in Contact. Basil Blackwell.
- van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
- Walton, D. N. (1995). A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy. University of Alabama Press.
- 23.Ylanne, V. (2008). Communication Accommodation Theory. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory (2nd ed., pp. 163-181). Continuum International Publishing Group.
Identifiers
Statistics
How to Cite
Copyright and Licensing

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


